"There should have not been any coercion. If the government takes sides, it is unfair," Din said in Jakarta as quoted by kompas.com.
Din made the remarks when he was asked to respond to reports on intimidation and threats against Shias who insisted to stay in Karanggayam and Bluuran Sampang villages. They have reportedly been forced to convert if they want their safety be guaranteed.
Din reiterated that any coercion against Shias in Sampang constituted a criminal act. The state should have taken action because every citizen is free to choose their own beliefs.
According to Din, the conflict in Sampang has to be settled based on the principle of freedom of religion.
Sunnis and Shias have both contributed a lot to Islam, despite differences in perception on who really lead Muslims after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Din said.
"Therefore, for you it's your belief, and for me my belief. But we have to live side by side peacefully. If we can live peacefully with non-Muslims, why can't be live in peace with fellow Muslims?" he asked.
Therefore Din hoped the groups would refrain from mocking each other. "Let God decide which truth is accepted, live side by side peacefully," he said.
Sampang Shia Spokesperson Hertasning Ichlas previously testified that the Sampang local administration had forced the Shias to sign an agreement of nine points, which included their willingness to return to "the true teaching of Islam" as well as to condemning of the teachings of Shia cleric Tajul Muluk, who is currently imprisoned over blasphemy.
According to Hertasning, several members of the Sampang Shia community had been asked to sign the agreement before Sampang Regent Fanan Hasib and Head of Sampang's Municipal Political and National Unity Office (Kesbangpol) Rudi Setiadi.
Source: The Jakarta Post